Written by Mitch Glaser
Articles on Messianic Prophecy
he answer to this
question is a resounding -"Yes!" Where do
the early rabbis draw their material from?
From the Jewish Scriptures! Two primary
Scriptures that the rabbis draw upon in their writings on
the Suffering Messiah are Psalm 22 and Isaiah 53.
, which Jewish scholars date to the
sixth or seventh century C.E., is a rabbinic document on
the festivals of Israel. It speaks of a suffering Messiah in
[When He created the Messiah,] the Holy One,
blessed be He, began to tell him the conditions [of his
future mission], and said to him: 'Those who are
hidden with you [your generation], their sins will in
the future force you into an iron yoke...and because
of their sin your tongue will cleave to the roof of your
mouth.' [Psalm 22:25] Do you accept this?
The Messiah said...'Master of the worlds! With
gladness in my soul and with joy in my heart I accept
it, so that not a single one of Israel should perish; and
not only those who will be alive should be saved in
my days, but even the dead who have died from the
days of Adam the first man until now.'1
The Midrash Aseret Memrot states that Messiah
will be made a trespass offering:
Written by Rachmiel Frydland
he subject was never discussed in my pre-war-Poland Hebrew school. In the rabbinical training I had received, the fifty-third chapter of the book of Isaiah had been continually avoided in favor of other, "weightier" matters to be learned. Yet, when I first read this passage, my mind was filled with questions:
Behold, my servant shall prosper, he shall be exalted, and extolled, and be very high. As many were astonished at thee; his visage was so marred more than any man, and his form more than the sons of men: So shall he sprinkle many nations; the kings shall shut their mouths at him: for that which had not been told them shall they see; and that which they had not heard shall they consider.
Who would have believed our report ?...
t's commonly maintained that Isaiah 53 was never considered messianic by rabbis and Jewish sages. Sometimes the statement is phrased as, "Judaism teaches" that Isaiah 53 refers to the nation of Israel.
The fact is that Isaiah 53 (more precisely, 52:13 to 53:12) has been interpreted in messianic terms by a wide variety of Jewish commentators over a long period of time. Other interpretations have certainly been offered, including the view first popularized by Rashi in medieval times that the prophet speaks of the nation of Israel. Neverthless the messianic interpretation has a long history in Jewish Bible exegesis, as shown by the quotations below.....
ome say that Zechariah 12:10 refers to the Gentile nations who mourn because of the Jewish martyrs (or a particular unknown martyr) they have killed.
Yet that is not the universal Jewish understanding. According to the views of some rabbis, two Messiahs would make their appearance: Messiah ben Joseph who would be slain in battle, followed by Messiah ben David who reigns as the victorious king. Any number of Jewish sources therefore refer this verse to the slaying of the Messiah ben Joseph. At least one commentator believes that the Messiah ben Joseph dies as an atonement for the sins of Israel. Some Jewish sources which take a messianic interpretation of Zechariah 12:10 are as follows:
Written by Tuvya Zaretsky
he rabbi's voice was warm. His eyes were filled with concern as he asked, "So please explain, what is this your parents are telling me? You believe in Yeshua? Is this true?" He listened quietly as I, one of his own bar mitzvah boys, the son of family friends, told the story of how I came to believe in Yeshua. "But explain to me," he pressed, "how is what you believe now any different from what we taught you here? What do you mean when you say Yeshua is the Son of God? In Judaism we believe we are all sons of God." His questions were difficult for me to answer. Frankly, it was hard because I didn't know how to articulate the differences. I only wish I knew then what I can explain now.
It is true that the Hebrew Scriptures speak to the issue of "the son of God," and in most cases, the context clearly defines who is the intended subject. If I could talk to the good rabbi today, I would be able to agree with him and then go on to explain further what our Scriptures say about The Son of God....
hough some say that Psalm 2 is not considered messianic by the rabbis or Jewish sages, the Jewish messianic understanding of Psalm 2 has a long history. Some of the rabbinic sources which take a messianic interpretation of Zechariah 12:10 are as follows:
Babylonian Talmud, Sukkah 52a
Our Rabbis taught, The Holy One, blessed be He, will say to the Messiah, the son of David (May he reveal himself speedily in our days!), 'Ask of me anything, and I will give it to thee', as it is said, I will tell of the decree etc. this day have I begotten thee, ask of me and I will give the nations for thy inheritance [Psalms 2:7-8].
ome claim that translating the word "bar" (in Psalm 2:12) as "son" rather than as "purity" is a distortion of the Hebrew text in order to make the verse apply to Jesus. It is also claimed that this is not a Jewish interpretation of the verse. And finally, it is said that the word "bar" means "son" only in Aramaic, whereas this psalm is in Hebrew.
Yet some important Jewish sources translate "bar" as "son." The translation can be supported by linguistic arguments. Therefore there is no basis for claiming that this rendering is a "Christian mistranslation." Some of these sources are as follows:....